§ 90K, paragraph 1,d) – since the conclusion of the contract, the circumstances have changed considerably, so that the children or the defendant suffer harshness if the agreement is not annulled; At Jess & Garvey (2018) FLC 93-827, the Assembly examined whether Anshun estoppel had not brought an appeal at an early stage of a procedure for the application of a financial agreement of 90B. The agreement was signed and the parties married in 2006. Beware of the possibility of a coercive argument [s90 (K) (1) (a)) if the parties try to discuss, negotiate and conclude an agreement in the vicinity of a marriage. In cases where it is not possible to deliberate – due to time constraints or the complexity of the financial situation of one of the parties – it may be necessary to oppose the action. If a potential particular disadvantage of one party is relevant to the other party [s90 (K)(1) (b) and (e), ensure that all appropriate steps are taken to ensure that the party concerned has time to consider the advice given and act accordingly. Justice Rees found that she was able to enforce the agreement. It found that, in the exercise of its extensive powers within the meaning of Article 90A, the Tribunal had an order for the sale of Land C. If she was wrong on this point, she is also convinced that the Tribunal has an inherent power, as found by the plenary session of the Family Court of Molier & van Wyk (1980) FLC 90-911, to impose follow-up provisions for the sale of suburban land C in order to guarantee the entry into force of the injunctions that obliged the husband to lighten the mortgage. Valid arguments could be made for and against the reforms. On the one hand, in favour of the possibility for the parties to conclude their own agreements, it can be said that this is in line with the usual freedom of contract that characterises our commercial law; whereas the parties should also acquire certainty before, during or after their marriage (or de facto relationship) where this can be achieved by a comprehensive agreement. On the other hand, financial agreements, especially those entered into before marriage (or de facto relationship), may be entered into in such a way as to consolidate the position of the most powerful party and maintain inequality and inequality that would otherwise be corrected by a change in property interests in accordance with section 79 of the Act. .